Drivers of the In-Mouth Interaction between Lupin Protein Isolate and Selected Aroma Compounds: A Proton Transfer Reaction-Mass Spectrometry and Dynamic Time Intensity Analysis.

Plant proteins often carry off-notes, necessitating customized aroma addition. In vitro studies revealed protein-aroma binding, limiting release during consumption. This study employs in vivo nose space proton transfer reaction-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry and dynamic sensory evaluation (time intensity) to explore in-mouth interactions. In a lupin protein-based aqueous system, a sensory evaluation of a trained "green" attribute was conducted simultaneously with aroma release of hexanal, nonanal, and 2-nonanone during consumption. Results demonstrated that enlarging aldehyde chains and relocating the keto group reduced maximum perceived intensity (Imax_R) by 71.92 and 72.25%. Protein addition decreased Imax_R by 30.91, 36.84, and 72.41%, indicating protein-aroma interactions. Sensory findings revealed a perceived intensity that was lower upon protein addition. Aroma lingering correlated with aroma compounds' volatility and hydrophobicity, with nonanal exhibiting the longest persistence. In vitro mucin addition increased aroma binding four to 12-fold. Combining PTR-ToF-MS and time intensity elucidated crucial food behavior, i.e., protein-aroma interactions, that are pivotal for food design.

Unraveling the Role of Flavor Structure and Physicochemical Properties in the Binding Phenomenon with Commercial Food Protein Isolates.

Food protein-flavor binding influences flavor release and perception. The complexity of the binding phenomenon lies in the flavor and protein properties. Thus, molecular interactions between commercial whey- or plant-based protein isolates (PI) such as pea, soy, and lupin, with carbonyl and alcohol flavor compounds were assessed by static headspace (HS) GC-MS. HS results showed that not only the displacement of the carbonyl group from the inner part of the flavor structure toward the edge promoted binding up to 52.76% ± 4.65 but also the flavor's degree of unsaturation. Similarly, thermal treatment led to a slight increase in hexanal-protein binding because of possible protein conformational changes. Protein's residual fat (<1%) seemed insufficient to promote significant flavor binding to PI. Despite the complexity of commercial food protein isolates, the results displayed that binding is predominantly influenced by the flavor structure and physicochemical properties, with the protein source and residual fat playing a secondary role.